Motivation and Satisfaction of Asian and European MBA Students at Siam University

Ashin Gandasara

Abstract


The analysis of student’s motivation and satisfaction for their university experience is important within the educational evaluation. The aim of the study was to examine difference motivation and satisfaction factors between Asian and European students to study Master of Business Administration
(MBA) at Siam University in Thailand, explore the reasons what are the different motivation and satisfaction factors of two groups of Asian and European MBA students at Siam University. Framework had been collected form secondary data. The study had explained the main factors that lead students to
motivate and satisfy during the study MBA at SIAM University. The study adopted the method and used a survey research design for data gathering. Data were collected by self-administered survey questionnaire on a 5-point Likert scale and comments with sixty-five MBA students who study Semester 3/2014 (April 16, 2015 to August 5, 2015) at Siam University in Thailand. Results show that the students study MBA because they have been motivated inside by their real need of becoming more valuable person and they are also pushed by labor market considered as an external factor. While the reason how is the different
Motivation and Satisfaction at Siam University.
After analyzing the GPA data of the 18 female and 46 male students the results are, that there is no statistically significant relation between the GPA and the gender. The mean rank of the 18 female students is 29 and 33, 87 of the male students. western students has the interested in the thai culture and
asian students the loyality to the roots and family reasons as main motivations for studying in thailand.
The study reported that 25% of responds are from European and 64% of respondent are from Asia and the rests are from Africa’s questionnaire, the coeffricient alpha reliability value for Motivation and Satisfaction was computed to be .80, which is regarded as reliable.
Furthermore students from asian nations tend to stay in asia to be near to the family, friends and the culture. western students also skip classes significantly more frequent than asian students. As their best motivation and satisfaction comes from external factors such as better education than their countries
(Asian), image of the university/course (Product) and personnel (People) the most, Promotion, educational management process, education fees (Price), good location for European and anyothers citizens. After the students have been studying in the university, they are satisfied enough with the physical characteristics such as university’s MBA office, education system, and services but they still require more psychological characteristics as they wish the university could provide such as student’s support, and job opportunity.


Keywords


Asian and European MBA Students at Siam University; Motivation; Satisfaction; Student Characteristics

Full Text:

Untitled

References


Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2007). Conceptual Model of Student Satisfaction in Higher Education.

Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. 571-588.

Athayde, R. (2009). The identification and measurement of innovative characteristics of young

people. Research report (NESTA).

Bean, J. P. & Bradley, R. K. (1986). "Untangling the satisfaction-performance relationship for college

students." Journal of Hiajer Education. 57, 393-412.

Bradley, M.M. (2009). The timing of emotional discrimination in human amygdale and ventral visual

cortex. Journal of Neuroscience. 29, 14864-14868.

Chantasuwanno, S. & Suasungnern, S. (2011). The motivation and satisfaction of the students towards

MBA at Karlstad University. retrieved July 19, 2015, from http://www.divaportal.

org/smash/get/diva2:427345/fulltext01. pdf.

Clotfelter, C. T. (2001). Who Are the Alumni Donors? Giving by Two Generations of Alumni from

Selective Colleges. Nonprofit Management and Leadership. 119-138.

Conger, D. & M.C. Long. (2010). “Why are Men Falling Behind? Explanations for the Gender Gap in

College”. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 184-214.

Einarson, M., & Matier, M. (2005). Exploring Race Differences in Correlates of Seniors' Satisfaction with

Undergraduate. Research in Higher Education. 641-676.

Gaier, S. (2005). Alumni Satisfaction with Their Undergraduate Academic Experience and the Impact on

Alumni Giving and Participation. International Journal of Educational Advancement. 279-288.

Guolla, M. (1999). Assessing the Teaching Quality to Student Satisfaction Relationship: Applied

Customer Satisfaction Research in the Classroom. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice.

-96.

Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (2010). The motivation to work. (12 th ed.). New Brunswick:

Transaction Publishers.

Kondou. (1999). Service quality dimensions and students satisfaction. retrieved July 19, 2015.

Lockheed, M. E., & Hanushek, E. (1994). Concepts of educational efficiency and effectiveness.

Human Resources Development and Operations Policy. Working Paper Series.

Maslow. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. retrieved Sep 16, 2015, from

http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Maslow/motivation.htm.

Mau, W.C., & Lynn, R. (1999). Racial and Ethnic Differences in Motivation for Educational Attainment

in the United States. Personality and Individual Differences. 27(6), 1091-1096.

Mortenson, T. G. (2005). Segregation of Higher Education Enrollment by Family Income and

Race/Ethnicity 1980 to 2004. Oskaloosa, IA: Postsecondary Education Opportunity.

Patti, M., Tarpley, R. .., Goree, C., & Tice, G. (1993). The Relationship of College Facilities and

Services to Student Retention. Proceedings of Mid-South Educational Research Association.

New Orleans: ERIC Document Reproduction .

Pike, G.R. (1993). The relationship between perceived learning and satisfaction with college: An

alternative view. Research in Higher Education. 34 , 23-40.

Roberts, J., & Styron Jr., R. (2010). Student satisfaction and persitence: factors vital to student retention.

Research in Higher Education. 6. retrieved Sep 16, 2015, from

http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/09321.pdf.

Sacerdote, Bruce. (2001). “Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Results from Dartmouth Roommates”.

Quarterly Journal of Economics. 116, 681-704.

Schreiner, L. A. (2009). Linking Student Satisfaction and Retention. Retrieved Sep 16, 2015, from

https://www.noellevitz.com/documents/shared/Papers_and_Research/2009/LinkingStudentSatis0

pdf.

Siam University. (2015). Course of MBA at Siam University. retrieved Sep 16, 2015, from

http://admission.siam.edu/course_m_mba_eng. php.

Thomas, E. H., Galambos, N. (2004). What satisfies students? Mining Student-Opinion Data with

Regression and Decision Tree Analysis. Research in Higher Education. 45, 251-269.

Wiers-Jenssen, J., Stensaker, B. & Grogaard, J.B. (2002) Student Satisfaction: towards an empirical

deconstruction of the concept. Quality in Higher Education. 8(2), 183-195.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.